I read an interesting
BusinessWeek article by
Catherine Holahan that reports on the rise of Internet marketing. First, a couple stats she mentions:
1) Internet advertising has risen to $16-17 billion in 2006, which represents 6% of total ad spend of $281 billion. That share is expected to increase to 7% in 2007 and 8% in 2008.
2) Prints ads (magazines and newspapers combined) still represent 38% of all ad spending, despite audiences spending triple the amount of time online than reading magazines and newspapers.
Why is it taking so long for this shift from print to Internet to occur? The common answer to this question is that these things take a while, both for advertisers to change their practices and for Internet marketing models to stabilize and become mainstream. And I certainly agree with this - in fact, we witness it every day from our perspective at Capterra.
However, I wonder how much two other facts are slowing the transition...
1) It strokes the ego of company executives to see their print ads in newspapers and such. Related to this, it may even help employees feel more excited about the companies they work for.
2) The added expense helps companies reduce their taxable income. Corporations are constantly looking for ways to spend would-be profits in order to reduce their taxes. So when they have an opportunity to spend a million dollars on ad campaign, they may choose to measure the ROI not on the million dollars but on 70% of a million dollars (assuming their corporate income tax bracket is 30%).
If the corporate income tax ever does go away, I'd be very interested to see what would happen to print ads. Any opinions? Email me at ortner@capterra.com.